“One of the main obstructions to meaningful action is ‘modern democracy’, he added. ‘Even the best democracies agree that when a major war approaches, democracy must be put on hold for the time being. I have a feeling that climate change may be an issue as severe as a war. It may be necessary to put democracy on hold for a while.'”
With this analogy, the invocation of war, Dr. Lovelock has equated the issue of “climate change” with war. In this war, the aggressor is mankind. If we were to uncritically accept the assumptions of the “climate change” zealots, the “climate change war”, as with all wars, can only end with defeat of the aggressor, the opponent. And, as with all wars where the stakes are as high as the “climate change” zealots claim, the only acceptable outcome is unconditional surrender and utter defeat of the aggressor. In the “climate change war,” the opponent to be defeated is mankind. To this end, Dr. Lovelock cannot with full honesty suggest democracy would be put “on hold for a while,” rather democracy would be put on hold indefinitely. In fact, democracy must be eliminated.
In the “climate change war,” mankind must eliminate mankind. Having pushed the “climate change” religion further to the logical extreme, we can safely conclude from Lovelock’s assertions that the “climate change” zealots represent mankind’s autoimmune disease.
“‘Fudging the data in any way whatsoever is quite literally a sin against the holy ghost of science,’ he said. ‘I’m not religious, but I put it that way because I feel so strongly. It’s the one thing you do not ever do. You’ve got to have standards.'”
Dr. Lovelock may not be religious in the strict traditional sense, but he most definitely has his religion. Furthermore, employing religious terms such as “sin” and “holy ghost” as the way to add credibility and weight to his argument is no different than new age “scientists” employing scientific terms to build plausible theories of efficacy in an attempt to lend credibility to their faith-based endeavors. And as the saying goes – brilliantly illustrated by the “climate change” religion – the nice thing about standards is there are so many from which to choose.